SCI论文发表很容易【1】：论文投稿

下面总结了SCI写作完成后投稿所需要的所用文件和模板

1.1 投稿：外文期刊投稿状态

（1**）Submitted to Journal** ：

当提交完成后，显示的状态信息是Submitted to Journal，该状态信息是自然生成的，无需人工干预。

（2**）With editor**

如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态：

① Editor assigned：编辑分派

Editor拒绝对外征稿：当编辑拒绝接受稿件时，主编通常会将稿件重新分配给其他编辑进行处理。

（3**）Reviewer(s) invited**

说明该编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。有时该过程会持续很长时间，如果该编辑尚未找到合适的审稿人，投稿者可以向编辑推荐合适的审稿人。

（4**）Under review**

审稿意见已提交，表明审稿人已接受待审稿稿件，正在进入审理阶段，这通常需要一个较长的等待时间（期刊通常会规定审稿时间，一般为一个月）。然而，前面的各个环节也可能耗时较长，具体取决于编辑部的处理速度。如果被邀请的审稿人不愿意参与评审工作，就会被拒绝，编辑部会另行邀请其他审稿人。

（5**）Required review completed**

审稿流程完成，等待编辑处理，通常在几天内可完成，但可能需要更长时间。有人提到有一篇文章完成了required review的状态，持续了一个月左右仍未收到任何消息。

（6**）Decision in process**

到了这一步，结果即将出现。编辑正在权衡是否接受修改，或者直接拒绝修改的可能性。当然，直接接受修改的可能性也是存在的，但这种情况发生的几率较低。

**（7）**Revision Submitted to Journal

修改后重新提交，等待编辑审理。

**（8）**Accepted

如果不进行再审，只是进行小修改，编辑在查看后会立即显示该状态，但如果需要再审，也会出现部分状态。快速处理，但有时也会遇到缓慢的情况。阅读杂志时，我会不时停下来欣赏其中的插图。

**（9）**Reject

1.2 催稿话术一

Dear Editor,

Hope this message finds you well. I’m uncertain whether it’s appropriate to reach out to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled "Impacts of the Uncertainties on the Vaccine Supply Chain under Different Government Subsidies" (ID: CAIE-D-21-01364). We have submitted the manuscript, and the current status of the submission being under review has persisted for seven months.

I am just wondering when I can receive the reviewers' comments?

Please, if you could spare some of your time to check the status for us.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Best regards!

Yours sincerely,

Xiufeng Li

1.2 催稿话术二

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

Hello! I apologize for the interruption. The author would like to inquire about the status of manuscript reference number ESWA-D-23-12972. As per the current system, the manuscript is currently in the "With Editor" stage. Therefore, I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused and would like to request your permission to arrange for the subsequent external review of the manuscript. Thank you very much!

1.3 Declaration of Competing Interest

（1）No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

The authors declare that they possess no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

1.4 Cover Letter

Dear Editor:

We are pleased to submit the enclosed manuscript, titled "___", which we hope will be considered for publication in the European Journal of Operational Research. The manuscript has been submitted for consideration, and all authors have approved its publication. We declare that the work described constitutes original research that has neither been published previously nor is under consideration for publication elsewhere, in full or in part. All authors listed have approved the enclosed manuscript.

本研究探讨了在需求信息不对称情况下，licensor与设计公司之间进行技术许可合同的可能性。本研究的主要贡献在于，licensor决定将技术许可给设计公司，后者基于供应商的技术设计产品，并将产品制造外包给竞争的下游制造商。通过运用机制设计理论，我们首先考察了需求信息不对称对licensor许可决策的影响。进一步研究licensor如何设定许可 Royalty，特别是当技术许可 Royalty对制造商 observable或unobservable时。我们探讨了合同可观察性对下游制造商批发定价的影响，并发现技术许可策略和公司利润在licensor与设计公司之间的许可 Royalty条款是否 observable to 下游制造商时受到至关重要的影响。

From our understanding, this is the pioneering work that examines the licensing contract design between a licensor and a design firm without manufacturing capabilities in the context of demand information asymmetry. We sincerely hope this paper will meet the requirements of European Journal of Operational Research. After carefully reading your journal’s policies, we are confident that our manuscript and study do not violate any of these guidelines. There are no potential conflicts of interest arising.

We sincerely acknowledge your attention to our manuscript. We look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Yours sincerely,

1.5 CRediT authorship contribution statement

XX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XX : Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. XX: Software, Writing – review & editing.

1.6 Acknowledgments

【1】模板一：

本研究得到国家自然科学基金（项目编号：71901199，72273135，71874167，71804170）的资助，同时也得到中国博士后科学基金面上项目（编号：2019M660170）的支持。此外，中央高校基本科研业务费（编号：201913015）和山东省自然科学基金项目（编号：19CHYJ10）也对本研究提供了必要的支持。同时，山东省博士后创新项目（编号：201902019）和山东省泰山学者特别项目（编号：tsqn20171205）对本研究的开展起到了关键作用。最后，国家社会科学基金重大课题项目（编号：18ZDA055）为本研究的深入研究提供了重要保障。

【2】模板二：

The first author is the corresponding author. The authors contributed equally to this paper. They are grateful to Nick Argyres (senior editor), Asli Arikan, Jay Barney, Glenn Hoetker, Joe Mahoney, Mike Peng, Jeff Reuer, three anonymous reviewers, as well as participants at the 2007 Academy of Management Annual Conference and the 2007 Strategic Management Society Annual Conference for their valuable comments. They also appreciate the comments they received from seminar participants at the universities where an earlier version of this paper was presented. They thank the Deming Center for Entrepreneurship at the University of Colorado for helping to build the ties to the venture capitalists, and man-agers who generously provided their time for this research. They also thank Josh Chuang, Sarah Knoblauch, Russell Otten, and Kuan-Hui Wu for providing excellent research assistance

【3】模板三：

The author extends gratitude to Chet Kapoor, Anant Jhingran, Bryan Kirschner, Sam Ramji, and John Rethans for their inspiring discussions, as well as his colleagues, Professors Olivier Rubel, Pantelis Loupos, Jörn Boehnke, Andrei Hagiu, Florin Niculescu, and Mingdi Xin, for their valuable feedback. Additionally, the author wishes to acknowledge the editorial team at Management Science for their highly insightful and constructive ideas throughout the review process, and seminar participants at University of California Davis, University of California Irvine, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Indian School of Business, University of Minnesota, Indiana University, Purdue University, and attendees of the Platform Strategy Research Symposium and Theory in Economics of Information Systems workshop for their meaningful contributions.

【4】模板四：

The authors express their heartfelt gratitude to the editor, associate editor, and reviewers for their unwavering support and expert suggestions. They also extend their sincere thanks to Remi Daviet, Xing Li, Gideon Nave, Jing-Ke Weng, and Yingjie Zhang, as well as seminar participants from the Asia School of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Duke University, East China Normal University, Harvard University, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Leshan Normal University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Peking University, Renmin University, Sun Yat-sen University, Temple University, University of Houston, University of Pennsylvania, University of Science and Technology of China, University of Western Ontario, and Xiamen University. Additionally, they acknowledge the contributions of attendees at the 2021 ISMS Doctoral Consortium and the 2021 Marketing Modelers’ Meeting. Zijing (Jimmy) Hu, Yuexin Song, and Weichao Yang offered exceptional research support.

【5】模板五：

The authors express our extreme gratitude to Prof. Woochoel Shin for his invaluable feedback. In addition, the authors are extremely thankful to the department editor, Brian Tomlin, the associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which led to a significantly improved manuscript.

【6】模板六：

The authors express gratitude to conference participants at the Platform Strategy Research Symposium, the Seventh Marketplace Innovation Workshop, the Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society, the Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, and the Conference on Information Systems and Technology for their valuable comments.

【7】模板七

The authors express gratitude for the constructive feedback comments provided by Yuxin Chen, Xi Li, K. Sudhir, the associate editor, and anonymous reviewers. The authors also acknowledge the valuable input from the seminar participants at Carnegie Mellon University and City University of Hong Kong. The authors equally contributed to this research, demonstrating their dedication to the project.

【8】模板八

Throughout the review process, the senior editor, the associate editor, and the anonymous reviewers provided the authors with helpful and constructive suggestions, which they gratefully acknowledged. Professor H. K. Cheng expresses his sincere gratitude to the John B. Higdon Eminent Scholar chair for the generous research support.

【9】模板九

The authors express their heartfelt gratitude to Ashish Arora and his team, the associate editor, and the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback, which played a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of the paper. Additionally, the authors extend their sincere thanks to Beril Toktay, Bradley Staats, Cheryl Gaimon, Marco Ceccagnoli, Karthik Ramachandran, Henry Sauermann, Serguei Netessine, and Erica Plambeck for their insightful comments. Furthermore, the seminar participants from the University of Minnesota, the University of Washington, and Georgia Institute of Technology provided valuable feedback and suggestions, which significantly contributed to the paper's improvement.

【模板十】

The grateful authors extend their thanks to the conference attendees at the Marketing Science Conference (Michigan 2009) and the Summer Institute in Competitive Strategy Conference (Berkeley 2010), as well as seminar participants at Washington University in St. Louis, Tel Aviv University, Bar-Ilan University, and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology for their valuable insights. Additionally, Rajiv Lal and David Godes provided insightful feedback on earlier drafts. The guest editor, associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers expressed appreciation for their constructive comments. The authors, reflecting their contribution to the work, are listed in reverse alphabetical order.

【5**】修改稿回复感谢--Acknowledgments**

The authors are acknowledged by the department editor, the associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and insightful comments.

The authors express gratitude to editor Duncan Simester, the Associate Editor, and three anonymous reviewers for their carefully conducted reviews of the paper. The insightful suggestions of the review team have led to a much improved manuscript.

The authors express gratitude to the department editor (Vishal Gaur), the anonymous associate editor, and three anonymous reviewers for their invaluable feedback. They also extend their sincere thanks to Manu Goyal of the University of Utah for his detailed insights.

1.7 Highlights

The technology licensing arrangement between a licensor and a design firm lacking manufacturing capacity is analyzed in the context of demand information asymmetry.

The impact of demand information asymmetry on the licensor’s licensing decisions has been systematically analyzed.

The technology licensing royalties are either observable or unobservable to downstream manufacturers have been examined.

An investigation into the impact of downstream competition and cooperation relationship on optimal licensing strategies reveals significant findings.

1.8 Response to Technical Check Results

Dear Editor,

Thank you for your constructive comments and suggestions on the manuscript structure. Following the feedback, we made necessary revisions to the manuscript, with detailed corrections outlined below each point.

I would like to have the list of author names, their affiliations, and contact information included within the Manuscript file of this submission.

The authors’ name information, affiliation details, and contact information have been incorporated into the Manuscript file of this submission.

The manuscript has been resubmitted to your journal. We express anticipation for your positive feedback.

Yours sincerely,

1.9 Title Page

Title

Abstract:

This paper investigates the technology licensing contract between a licensor and a design firm without manufacturing capacity under demand information asymmetry. The licensor decides to license technology to design firm, which designs products based on the supplier’s technology and outsources the product manufacturing to competitive downstream manufacturer. By employing Mechanism Design Theory, we first examine the effect of the demand information asymmetry on the licensor’s licensing decisions. Furthermore, we then study how the licensor sets licensing royalty if the technology licensing royalty terms are observable or unobservable to downstream manufacturer, who offers wholesale price quote to the design firm. We show the implications of contract observability on downstream manufacturer’s wholesale pricing, and find that technology licensing strategies and firm profits are critically affected by whether or not licensing royalty terms between a licensor and design firm are observable to a downstream manufacturer. Particularly, licensor can be better off if the license royalty is kept observable, under specific conditions, whereas a downstream firm can be worse off. In other words, the licensor prefers the observable contract while the design firm prefers the unobservable contract in most cases. Our research offers new insights on how to design licensing contract in a complicated supply chain setting.

供应链治理; 技术授权; 机制设计理论; 信息不对称现象; 下游协同竞争

供应链治理; 技术授权; 机制设计理论; 信息不对称现象; 下游协同竞争

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out through the International/Regional Cooperation and Exchange initiatives of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 71881330167].

Declarations of interest: none

1.10 给编辑部的祝福

访问该种学术资源的完整路径为：https://wenku.baidu.com/view/3148c8b3abea998fcc22bcd126fff705cd175c74?fr=sogou&_wkts_=1676124809228

1.11 Author Agreement

The approval of the manuscript by all authors pertains to its publication. I declare that the work described constitutes original research, previously unpublished and not under consideration elsewhere, in full or partial. The manuscript enclosed has been approved by all the authors listed.

1.12. Ethical Statement

The authors have declared no conflict of interest. Studies involving human participants adhered to the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, as well as the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not include any studies involving animals conducted by the authors. Consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

1.13. 基金资助

Acknowledgments:

This work was funded through a significant national initiative for the Social Sciences of China [No. 21&ZD102].

1.14. 作者介绍

【1】模板一

Leonardo Babun is an alumni of the CyberCorps Scholarship for Service program. He is a member of the Cyber-Physical Systems Security Lab (CSL) at Florida International University, which is part of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Leonardo Babun earned his Doctoral degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2020 and his Master's degree in Computer Engineering in 2019, both from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Florida International University. Additionally, he earned his Master's degree in Electrical Engineering from Florida International University in 2015. Leonardo Babun's research interests are centered around the security and privacy aspects of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and the Internet of Things (IoT). Please contact him at lbabu002@fiu.edu for further inquiries.

【2】模板二

Kyle Denney目前在麻省理工学院林肯实验室从事网络安全研究，并获得了CyberCorps Service校友奖学金。2019年，他在佛罗里达国际大学电气与计算机工程系获得了硕士学位，2017年，他在 Ferris State University 获得应用数学学士学位。他的研究兴趣集中在Cyber–Physical Systems (CPS)以及物联网（IoT）和其它轻量设备的安全。

【3】模板三

Patrick McDaniel是宾夕法尼亚州立大学电气工程与计算机科学学院信息与通信技术系的威廉L·韦斯教授，同时担任网络安全与信息网络研究中心的主任。他是IEEE、ACM和AAAS的会员，并担任NSF前沿中心信任worthy机器学习项目的负责人。从2013年到2018年，他在美国陆军研究实验室的网络安全协作研究联盟担任项目主管和首席科学家。Patrick的研究方向涵盖计算机和网络安全的广泛领域以及技术公共政策。他在2004年前在AT&T Labs-Research担任高级研究 staff成员。请将此电邮地址转至[mcdaniel@cse.psu.edu]。

【4】模板四

Selcuk Uluagac is the director of the Cyber-Physical Systems Security Lab at Florida International University, specializing in the security and privacy aspects of the Internet of Things and cyber-physical systems. He holds degrees of Ph.D., M.S., and M.S. from Georgia Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, and the University of Padova, respectively. In 2015 and also in 2016, he received the prestigious US National Science Foundation CAREER award and the Summer Faculty Fellowship from both the US Air Force Office of Sponsored Research and the University of Padova, Italy. Currently, he serves on the editorial boards of the EEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Elsevier Computer Networks, and the IEEE Communications and Surveys and Tutorials. Please contact him at suluagac@fiu.edu.

1.15. 感谢主编

Express our heartfelt gratitude to the Editor-in-Chief for their understanding and patience, which enables our paper to better satisfy the journal's requirements.

1.16. Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study can be accessed from the corresponding author for review.

The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are accessible in the [NAME] repository, with a persistent web link provided at [PERSISTENT WEB LINK TO DATASETS].

During the current study, the datasets used and/or analysed are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

Each dataset generated or analyzed during this study is comprehensively collected within this published article [and its supplementary information files].

The datasets produced and/or examined during the current study are not publicly accessible owing to [REASON WHY DATA ARE NOT PUBLIC] but can be accessed from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

Data dissemination does not apply to this article because no datasets were either generated or analyzed during the current study.

The dataset that supports the findings of this study can be accessed from [third party name], though certain limitations exist regarding their availability, as these data were sourced under a license for the current study and are therefore restricted. The dataset, however, can be accessed from the authors upon making a reasonable request and with permission from [third party name].

party name].

If your document does not include any data, please submit 'Not applicable' in this section.

1.17. 其他投稿文件

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Authors Contributions

XXX设计了这个研究，并进行了研究的背景分析和撰写。所有作者都仔细阅读了并最终确认了该论文稿。

Funding

None

1.18. 附录说明

Supplementary Materials are available online in the Supplementary Materials section.

Appendix A. Proofs of Results in Main Text

Appendix B. 3D打印店内采购与验证的额外合同分析

1.19. 移除RBI代码复现选项

Dear Editor,

During the submission process, we erroneously chose the RBI option. Nevertheless, our study focuses on the analysis of management decision-making within expert systems, unrelated to any associated computer codes. We wish to know if it is feasible to remove the RBI option.

Thank you for your understanding and assistance.

1.20. Supplemental Material

Supplemental material to this paper is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0785